Laser Cutting Vs Waterjet Cost

Waterjet and laser are typically much more expensive to operate requiring specialist gases and other high cost consumables. Waterjet will depend on the quality of the outcome. Waterjet cutting vs laser cutting.

laser cutting machine repair laser co2 fraccionado estrias antes y despues kitchen remodel appliance package large wooden salad bowl set large tree of life metal wall art laser for smoking moncton large rustic framed chalkboard laser cut wall

Pin On Health

Waterjet Vs Laser Cost Effective Metal Prototyping Youtube

Pin On Tools

The Design And Development Of The First Ever Low Cost Waterjet Cutter Water Jet Diy Cnc Diy Water

How One Small Change Made Waterjet What It Is Today Water Jet Diy Cnc Router Diy Cnc

The benefit of the laser cutter is its ability to cut thinner material at a far higher rate of speed than the water jet.

Laser cutting vs waterjet cost. Method and the convenience of each method. With the automatic dual pallet loading system and lights out capability we can ensure quick. When cutting thin materials with laser very high cutting speeds can be achieved which can help to reduce the cost per part. Customers often choose laser cutting for its cost effectiveness cutting tolerances as close as 003 repeatability 001 and for its cutting capacity up to 3 4 carbon steel and 5 8 stainless steel.

Thick and brass less than 0 16 in. In thickness of 1 4 and less the laser would be the more cost effective option when cutting metals. Laser cutters can cut thick materials but a waterjet machine can cut thicker objects the optimal thickness being 0 4 to 2 0 10 to 50 mm while for laser cutting it is 0 12 to 0 4 3 to 10 mm. The cost of laser would be slightly higher typically estimated at around 20 hour.

Choosing between laser and waterjet cutting would therefore entirely depend on your specifications. Type of metal or material you d like to cut cost involved the efficiency of the machine or. The accuracy and quality of the cut. Let s do some quick math.

Laser cutting cost in terms of operation is not even close. Many advertisements for fiber laser tout its ability to cut brass copper and aluminum. It s not possible to say which one is better as each can be more suitable for different materials and applications. Waterjet cutting is much slower and much more costly per hour of use.

The bottom line the best method to use whether its plasma cutting vs. Because these materials are quite soft they are also good candidates for an abrasive waterjet. Choosing between laser and waterjet cutting is not as straightforward as it may seem. The cutting stream of a water jet is typically 030 040 in.

Generally though laser will cut faster on aluminum less than 0 20 in. Combined with the speed and precision of cutting waterjet vs. Say you have a project that adds up to 15 000 in total cuts. Waterjet is both slow and costly to run making it the least productive system to operate.

Waterjet is usually considered to be the most expensive typically estimated at about 30 hour.